China says it will ignore America's meaningless number games

 

China has responded strongly to recent remarks and data points presented by the United States, stating that it will ignore what it calls “America’s meaningless number games.” This statement comes amid growing tensions between the two global powers over trade, economic data, and geopolitical influence.

The Chinese government criticized the U.S. for using selective economic statistics and manipulated figures to portray China in a negative light, especially in areas such as trade deficits, manufacturing output, and technological development. Chinese officials argue that the U.S. has been engaging in what they describe as "statistical warfare"—using numbers out of context or in a misleading manner to support political narratives and justify policy decisions, such as sanctions or export restrictions.

One major point of contention has been the U.S. claim of an "unfair" trade imbalance, with American officials citing massive trade deficits with China as evidence of exploitation. However, Chinese representatives argue that these figures ignore the global supply chain reality, where many goods exported from China include components and technology from other countries, including the U.S. itself.

Additionally, Beijing has pushed back against recent American claims about China’s slowing economy. While acknowledging economic challenges, Chinese officials maintain that the U.S. is exaggerating weaknesses and ignoring long-term growth indicators to influence international perceptions and global markets. They say these tactics are not just misleading but are part of a broader strategy to contain China's rise on the world stage.

In dismissing what it calls “number games,” China emphasizes the importance of cooperation over confrontation. Government spokespeople have urged the U.S. to focus on meaningful dialogue and mutual respect, rather than relying on data manipulation to serve short-term political goals. They argue that such tactics only damage bilateral relations and create unnecessary tensions in the global economy.

Experts suggest that the statement from China reflects broader frustration with what it sees as the U.S. using economic data as a political weapon. As both nations continue to compete for global influence, this war of words underscores the deep mistrust and strategic rivalry that now defines U.S.-China relations.

In conclusion, China’s rejection of U.S. "number games" signals a hardened stance against what it views as economic propaganda and reflects ongoing efforts to assert control over its global image and economic

 narrative.